Silly corn subsidies

I can’t help but think about The West Wing’s King Corn. “Did you take the ethanol pledge?”

Treehugger reports on Jeff Goodell‘s article in Rolling Stone:

He starts strongly: “The great danger of confronting peak oil and global warming isn’t that we will sit on our collective asses and do nothing while civilization collapses, but that we will plunge after “solutions” that will make our problems even worse. Like believing we can replace gasoline with ethanol, the much-hyped biofuel that we make from corn.” and explains the political pressures that lead so many politicians like Obama, Clinton, McCain, and Edwards, who should know better, to support it.
Before the “corn is just the first step” people jump in, Jeff covers that, quoting Vinod Kholsa, but explaining how cellulosic ethanol, if it can be scaled up to production, is still no answer. “replacing fifty percent of our current gasoline consumption with cellulosic ethanol would consume thirteen percent of the land in the United States – about seven times the land currently utilized for corn production. ”
The facts are straightforward: Filling the tank of 1 SUV with pure ethanol consumes more than 450 pounds of corn, enough calories to feed a person for a year. “if we rely on ethanol to save the day, we could soon find ourselves forced to make a choice between feeding our SUVs and feeding children in the Third World. And we all know how that decision will go.”

Published by

Jonathan Blundell

I'm a husband, father of three, blogger, podcaster, author and media geek who is hoping to live a simple life and follow The Way.

Share your thoughts and snarky comments...