This week’s column: Getting cross at Xmas

Getting cross about Christmas

Turn on a television or radio anywhere these days and you’re sure to hear a debate or comments being made about an active conspiracy to take Christ out of Christmas.
Suddenly even President Bush has joined the rank and file of the liberal-left, according to members of the ultra-right, using the phrase “Happy Holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas” on his yearly Christmas cards.
And every year we hear people scream and shout about people who use Xmas in advertising or Christmas cards.
But what’s really behind the abbreviation? Does X mark the spot of anti-Christianity?
Many think Xmas is a recent invention of liberal Hollywood or leftist New Yorkers.
But use of Xmas can be found in the Oxford English Dictionary in 1551, 50 years before the first English colonists arrived in the New World and 60 years before the completion of the King James Version of the Bible.
At that time Xian and Xianity were both common abbreviations as well.
It’s been suggested that the X is simply an indication of the cross Jesus was crucified upon, but that is unlikely. The shape of the cross Jesus died upon is traditionally believed to have been the shape of a “t” rather than an “X”.
The X can however be traced back to Christ and the early Greek church.
The Greek transliteration for Christ is Christos, which begins with the Greek X, pronounced “Chi.”
During the Roman rule of Jerusalem and much of the known world, Christians would identify themselves with several symbols including the Greek X, the Chi-Ro or XP (the first two letters of Christos, the XC (first and last letters) or IC (last two letters).
The Christians used the symbols to identify each other in a time when they were commonly fed to lions and killed for their faith.
An interesting side story is a dream the Roman Emperor Constantine I had in October 312, involving the Chi-Ro. After his dream, he emblazoned the Christian symbol on all the military shields and armor before they marched to a great victory at the Battle of Milvian Bridge. After his victory, he legalized Christianity and accepted the new faith.
With the legalization of Christianity, the religion continued to spread across the world through oral and written tradition.
As Christianity spread, the abbreviation continued on manuscripts, charts and tables to save space.
And with the advent of the printing press, the church used the abbreviation even more during a time when font sizes were limited and type was set by hand.
But now the abbreviation has come 180 degrees as the phrase is now viewed as sacrilegious and boycotts are threatened for businesses who use it.
And thus the conspiracy continues.

Seriously…

There are people in my office talking about boycotting local businesses because they have signs that say Happy Holidays instead of Merry Christmas.
Who cares?!
There are a number of “Christian sub-culture” issues that just blow me away.
Like refusing to celebrate with Santa Clause (based upon an actual St. Nicholas), refusing to shop at stores that say, “Holiday tree” or “Happy Holidays.”
I watched a debate on TV with people who were flamin’ mad because President Bush sent out a “holiday” card that said, “Happy Holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas.”
There are more than one holidays between Thanksgiving and New Years. Can’t we celebrate them all?
The whole issue of having manger scenes and the 10 Commandments on public property bugs me too. I don’t believe either is constitutional. But people who claim they’re faith is so strong, feel they have to have things like this to remind them of their faith in the public square.
If you want a manager scene, or 10 commandments, put them on your church property or your own house.
When was the last time you saw a church with the 10 commandments posted? Or a house with a large sculpture with the 10 commandments?
Come on. Don’t expect the rest of the world to do something you wont.
I hope all the baptists that flocked to see The Chronicles of Narnia, didn’t forget the boycott they had against Disney for so many years.
I’m quite sure Disney hasn’t changed their stance on anything, but because they produce a movie that was based on a Christian’s writing, its OK to be a Disney fan now. Geeze.
Maybe I’m missing the point here, but its really bugging me and I think something should be said.
So there. I said it.