Twitter in plain English

The folks at CommonCraft have put together a great basic video explaining Twitter in plain English.

Great stuff. I know my mom reads my Twitter feed (per some of the questions and conversations she brings up) but I think she reads it via the Casa de Blundell news feed – not going to the Twitter site per-say. Wonder if I can ever get her to sign up and start Twittering during the day…..

If you’re interested, I’m jdblundell on Twitter.
My best friend, (that doesn’t live with me) Matt, is Medicmml.
My buddy Thomas is headphonaught.
My good friend and pastor Brian is at Brian12345678 (although you won’t get much out of him).
You can get encounter news via encounterthis.

Anyone else out there that I should be following?

BTW – I love the simple video CommonCraft did as well. Nothing with fancy computer graphics – just fun paper images moved around with their hands and fingers.

re: Social networking and the church

the city

Found some more info on Mars Hill’s social network, The City:

The site is being built around physical communities not as much as around online communities.

One of the design principles of The City, which has guided virtually every decision we’ve made, is that the physical is more important than the virtual. This subtle but significant difference provides the foundation for understanding how this new thing is going to work…

On my Facebook page, I’ve got dozens of friends. Of those friends, I would imagine that about one third are actually in the Seattle area. The other two thirds are people literally all over the world. While there is a certain cool factor in having a virtual Rolodex of everyone I’ve ever known, is there anything more to it than that? Sure, if I’m planning a trip out to one of the areas where they will be, it’s rather convenient, and I get to find out that my college friend is eating a ham sandwich (a la Twitter), but that doesn’t change my life or their life for that matter. When you’re trying to build an intentional community, Facebook just doesn’t cut it. There are too many off topic, off mission sorts of diversions that the game aspect of the site dominates any mission it could try to carry.

Now, Facebook can be incredibly missional for the 1% that choose to use it as a mission field and network specifically with that in mind, but I’m trying to think along the lines of how you get the 80% to that level. The framework will either make a compelling community, or it will not. I don’t believe Facebook ever will do that for the 80%.

More specifically they’re building the site around physical neighborhoods.

Simply, your neighborhood is everyone that lives near you. Pretty basic eh? So why is this a cool concept? Let’s look at a concrete yet fictional example.

John is a community group leader in Ballard; he hosts his group just a little down the road from the public library off Market. He’s got a relatively new group with just five folks in regular attendance. He invites people to his group regularly, but they live all over the place! Ballard draws people from all over Seattle (and beyond), and finding the right people has been tough.

Jim is new to Mars Hill. He attended his first service, stopped by The City kiosk afterwards, and signed up to be “connected”, whatever that means. The volunteer that helped him was nice enough, but Jim doesn’t know what he’s supposed to do next. He lives near the old firehouse on Market, in fact, he works as a Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu coach at the studio there. If only John knew Jim was in his backyard…

This is where the ‘neighborhood’ thing I checked into the code this morning comes into play. John would see in The City that a new guy showed up in his neighborhood (without having to dig for it), maybe The City would even say, “hey, you’re the closest community group!” and John could reach out to Jim with a couple of clicks.

Love it!

Social networking and the church

I’ve written about social networking (i.e. MySpace, Facebook, etc) here before. I’ve also written about the idea of churches getting behind these networks and putting them to use for marketing, announcements, building community, etc. etc.

I haven’t heard a lot of feedback other than on the techie side of things. I read recently about Mars Hill’s social networking strategy over at digital.leadnet.org.

Here’s an overview:

  • Pastor Mark Driscoll’s Facebook profile has 4000 friends
  • Less than 20% of these friends are from the Seattle area
  • He has apps to read in his blog, link to his books from Amazon, play videos from their Ask Anything sermon series, and read in Mars Hill RSS feeds
  • He gets 20 messages and wall posts a day
  • Mark Driscoll’s Myspace profile has 400 friends

In addition to this, Dustin told digital.leadnet about an internal project they’re working on – “Our IT department is currently developing our own social network, the City, that will be used for almost all communication within the church.” More info on their soon-to-launch social network here.

This is very cool in my book (of course Mars Hill apparently has a full IT team and their own blog). They’re building the site on Ruby on Rails. Not real familiar with that software or “programing language” but it looks cool. I’m looking at doing something with Elgg.org for now. But I’m seeing more folks using Ruby on Rails. Might be worth looking into.

So the techies are interested in all this and implementing it – but for me part of the thrill of implementing a social network for encounter or other churches is the challenge aspect of it. I wonder how enthused average users or church members would be in using it.

So I put together a quick survey over on the encounter blog. I’ve plugged it via our Twitter feed, our Facebook group, a MySpace bulletin and of course here. I’d encourage you to take a second and fill out the form, regardless of if you’re an active part of encounter or not. And I’d love for you to push the survey on your own blogs as well. The more input the better.

And yes – you can remain anonymous in filling out the form.

Who did you twitter about on Super Tuesday

Twitter just released a graph showing name mentions of all the remaining presidential candidates on Super Tuesday.

Looks like Obama was the clear winner with each candidate getting a spike when they spoke that night.

See the graph for yourself.

And here’s a look at Twitter traffic during the Super Bowl.

Oh – and according to the Twitter blog – looks like AT&T was sucking up all my SMS messages last week and early this week.

Microsoft wants to take over Flickr

You know, I heard lots of news about Microsoft wanting to buy Yahoo over the weekend.
And while I’m not a huge fan of Microsoft by any means I didn’t think too much of it at the time. After all “I don’t use Yahoo – I usually stick with Google.”
But a post by Lifehacker today made me rethink that.

I use Flickr religiously – a company now owned by Yahoo.
I use del.icio.us now religiously as well – another company now owned by Yahoo.
I also play fantasy football on Yahoo.

Wait a minute – I don’t want Microsoft having ANY say in my online pictures and bookmarks or fantasy football!
Click here for a list of other companies Yahoo now owns that would be owned by Microsoft if the acquisition goes through.

Thoughts?

Excel/ Access hack

This is probably a simple hack many have already thought of, but it came in super handy for me today.
I had to search an Access database for college courses that are no longer offered in our district. Apparently a number of colleges still show them as active at their college though so I wanted to be sure they were all set to “de-active” or “no” in our database.
After several minutes I was getting cross-eyed trying to check the appropriate line.
To remedy the solution I simply posted a post-it note above the bottom line. Every time I did a search for no in the appropriate column, that row appeared right below my post-it note and kept me focused on the line I needed to make changes to.

In other solutions/ideas to help keep you focused on what you’re working on?

hack.jpg