Relevant Magazine has an interesting piece online from Jason Johnson about relevance and what it means in today’s church.
Relevance. It has become the ecclesiological buzz-word of the postmodern culture. The church spends large amounts of time, energy and money on this idea of relevance, and Christians themselves are doing everything they possibly can to feel like—in some part—this term is an identifying mark on who they are as followers of Christ. This idea of relevance is admirable and necessary. But as I look around and evaluate my own attitudes toward this culture and understandings of how the Church relates to it, I (first and foremost) might have it backwards.
I believe that on some levels the idea of relevance has been reduced to a formula of learning to speak the right lingo, dress the right way, be familiar with the right music and movies, be involved in the right causes, go to the right churches, hang out with the right people, eat the right foods, drink the right drinks, have the right hairstyle and, most importantly, be familiar with all of the most relevant leaders and thinkers of this postmodern/emergent generation.
Honestly, admit it, when you encounter someone who does not know who Rob Bell or Brian McLaren are, does it not surprise you just a bit?
This really got me:
The fact that we have to spend so much time trying to be relevant should tell us something. It is an indication that relevance is not something that happens naturally. That’s why we have to spend so much time manufacturing it according to the formula.
It’s true that people are looking to make their faith relevant. I believe non-believers want to see why the Christian faith and GOd should be relevant to them. But dressing a certain way, watching the right movies, drinking the right drinks doesn’t make you relevant.
If you’re trying to do that, it makes you a fake and a phony in my book. I think people are much more interested in authenticity than relevance.
My dad may not be the most stylish man on the block. He may not know a thing about the latest trends but people can look at him and see true, authentic faith. And they’re drawn to that.
His faith is real and constant. In the midst of trials and tribulations he remains faithful and he continues to tell others and share with others about how God has remained faithful to him.
If we’re true to ourselves, God and others, our faith becomes relevant — regardless of whether or not we listen to U2, Cold Play or the Gaither Vocal Band.
The idea of relevance also brings to mind many episodes of “What Not To Wear.” (I know – I’ve watched it. Are you shocked? Laurie’s a huge fan.)
The image of relevance brings one picture to mind. The thirty-something mother who’s trying to dress hip for her kids or her kids’ friends.
“No. It looks bad!”
Why? Because you’re trying to be something you’re not. You’re 36 years old and trying to pull off a mini-skirt.
If wearing Mossimo or Stussy isn’t you then wearing it isn’t going to draw people to you or to Christ.
Paul said, “I have become all things to all men so that I might win some to Christ.” But I don’t think Paul was going around, hanging out with the Romans, wearing a Toga just so he could fit in.
When I’ve gone to Austin Street to minister to the homeless, they’re not expecting me to show up in torn dirty clothes and sleep on the streets with them. They want to see that I’m authentic with them. I don’t try to hide that I live in Waxahachie. I don’t try to hide that I have fairly decent clothes. They don’t care. They’re excited to see that my faith has made an impact in my life and it can make an impact in their lives too.
Johnson ends with this:
Wear the torn and tattered jeans, listen to the indie-pop music, read the most current authors, even buy a Mac if you want—but never substitute those things as what it truly means to be relevant. Relevance is found only through the inevitable expressions of a heart that is pursuing the greatest of all causes.
Like this:
Like Loading...